|
Post by pantherman66 on Dec 27, 2014 11:49:14 GMT
My friend didn't tell me that, we saw it with our own eyes cheers bud.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2014 12:12:18 GMT
According to Steeltalk they made a poor team look good. Magnanimous in defeat as ever.
|
|
|
Post by GuinnessMan on Dec 27, 2014 12:31:15 GMT
According to Steeltalk they made a poor team look good. Magnanimous in defeat as ever. ... Not all had that view Jono to be fair.
|
|
|
Post by Lord of the Rinks on Dec 27, 2014 12:48:56 GMT
According to Steeltalk they made a poor team look good. Magnanimous in defeat as ever. So does that mean a poor Panthers side made a good Steelers side look poor. ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2014 13:25:48 GMT
According to Steeltalk they made a poor team look good. Magnanimous in defeat as ever. ... Not all had that view Jono to be fair. The majority have though. As is typical when Steelers lose it's not because they were beaten by a better side but because they were bad.
|
|
Shaggy
Forum Moderator
Am I a cynical idealist or an idealistic cynic?
Posts: 10,995
|
Post by Shaggy on Dec 27, 2014 13:49:07 GMT
... Not all had that view Jono to be fair. The majority have though. As is typical when Steelers lose it's not because they were beaten by a better side but because they were bad. Bad? To be shut out 4-0 on home ice by a "poor" team that they outnumber... that goes well beyond bad and out the other side. So either the Steelers resembled something that gets flushed down the toilet (taking 2 or 3 tries ) or maybe, just maybe, the Panthers aren't and weren't quite as poor as all that...
|
|
Shorty
Paul Adey
Still here for Private Messages
Posts: 6,636
|
Post by Shorty on Dec 27, 2014 14:00:41 GMT
According to Steeltalk they made a poor team look good. Magnanimous in defeat as ever. We are a poor team though are we not? Don't you read the Cage?
|
|
jester
Robert Lachowicz
Posts: 533
|
Post by jester on Dec 27, 2014 14:01:06 GMT
The majority have though. As is typical when Steelers lose it's not because they were beaten by a better side but because they were bad. Bad? To be shut out 4-0 on home ice by a "poor" team that they outnumber... that goes well beyond bad and out the other side. So either the Steelers resembled something that gets flushed down the toilet (taking 2 or 3 tries ) or maybe, just maybe, the Panthers aren't and weren't quite as poor as all that... Isn't that true with every team?
|
|
|
Post by GuinnessMan on Dec 27, 2014 14:05:55 GMT
... Not all had that view Jono to be fair. The majority have though. As is typical when Steelers lose it's not because they were beaten by a better side but because they were bad. Which is not dis-similar to our views when we lose on many an occasion too. Agreed that does seem the majority view over on steeltalk, which if you had said that initially I wouldnt have challenged your statement - anyway we are both on the same page now it seems.
|
|
|
Post by GuinnessMan on Dec 27, 2014 14:08:25 GMT
According to Steeltalk they made a poor team look good. Magnanimous in defeat as ever. We are a poor team though are we not? Don't you read the Cage? At times we have been worse than poor, others have been better than good ... generally though the games i have seen this season have largely been dull
|
|
BigLad
David Clarke
Threads: @AntMJ11
Posts: 3,593
|
Post by BigLad on Dec 27, 2014 14:28:16 GMT
My friend didn't tell me that, we saw it with our own eyes cheers bud. We won 1 face-off in the Fife game. 1. Uno. Majority?!?!?
|
|
|
Post by bruinspanthers on Dec 27, 2014 15:07:42 GMT
My friend didn't tell me that, we saw it with our own eyes cheers bud. We won 1 face-off in the Fife game. 1. Uno. Majority?!?!? It is by far one of the biggest weakness of this team, never feel confident that we will win the face off when watching and ultimately results on us being on the back foot most of time Confidence might be factor here and if we get on a run hopefully see face off winning % go up Still seriously miss our good faceoff takers from previous years I think
|
|
|
Post by pantherman66 on Dec 28, 2014 9:35:38 GMT
Big Lad how's your Labradore getting on.
|
|
BigLad
David Clarke
Threads: @AntMJ11
Posts: 3,593
|
Post by BigLad on Dec 29, 2014 12:35:17 GMT
Big Lad how's your Labradore getting on. Based on you stating we won the majority of faceoffs in that game, I'd say it's you that needs the assistance dog pal.
|
|
|
Post by pantherman66 on Dec 29, 2014 12:59:51 GMT
Whatever you say chum!
|
|
Shaggy
Forum Moderator
Am I a cynical idealist or an idealistic cynic?
Posts: 10,995
|
Post by Shaggy on Dec 29, 2014 13:30:26 GMT
All right you two... pack it in with the petty little digs.
|
|
|
Post by fishman on Dec 31, 2014 10:08:52 GMT
Anyone got a copy of the this game to look at?
|
|
|
Post by jd on Dec 31, 2014 10:54:54 GMT
Thought the highlights would have been up by now
|
|
|
Post by ted logan on Dec 31, 2014 11:42:01 GMT
Thought the highlights would have been up by now Oh they would be if the scoreline was reversed. When we lost up there on December 6th the highlights were up on the 8th. Beat us on October 4th, highlights up on the 6th.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2015 23:41:49 GMT
Highlights now available. Dowd clearly punches Berube while he is on the ice, yet another one he's got away with!
|
|
|
Post by Rob Scott on Jan 1, 2015 23:59:16 GMT
DOTS
|
|
|
Post by ted logan on Jan 2, 2015 2:54:43 GMT
Dowds fists were clearly attacked by Berube's head/face.
Can't believe Berube hasn't been banned and deported for such a senseless attack on the golden child.
|
|
|
Post by GuinnessMan on Jan 2, 2015 9:09:32 GMT
Dowd clearly punches Berube while he is on the ice, yet another one he's got away with! Nothing of any significance though imo.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2015 16:12:01 GMT
Decent highlights those. 'Interesting' call on the slash. Would have been furious if we were on the end of that at our gaffe.
|
|
|
Post by ted logan on Jan 2, 2015 17:05:02 GMT
Decent highlights those. 'Interesting' call on the slash. Would have been furious if we were on the end of that at our gaffe. Agreed. In fairness, would have to say decent commentary from DS too.
|
|