|
Post by bobness on Oct 25, 2021 13:49:46 GMT
As I previously said, please go back and look at the thread. Then go back and have a look at how many of Mary’s posts were aimed at,or blamed or had a dig at me. I looked yesterday and it happened quite a lot for somebody who didn’t post a great deal. The sound of straws being clutched at. MH posted 3 times. The first post just lamented the return of the discussion of attendance figures, the second and third were themselves a reaction to your "tripe" post.
|
|
iginla
Chick Zamick
Posts: 13,446
Member is Online
|
Post by iginla on Oct 25, 2021 13:52:14 GMT
2) If you disagree with a post, attack the content rather than the author. We're all grown-ups, show proper respect to other posters. 3) We operate zero tolerance on 'Trolling', ie comments not helpful to the debate but made in order to provoke an adverse reaction from other posters. Your "tripe" post clearly is against these two "rules", for me, I'm afraid. And I wonder how many times I’ve been attacked as the poster....hundreds of times at a guess !!! And by many different people on here too, it works two ways you know. Or it should,but in my case it obviously doesn’t.
|
|
|
Post by bobness on Oct 25, 2021 14:27:23 GMT
2) If you disagree with a post, attack the content rather than the author. We're all grown-ups, show proper respect to other posters. 3) We operate zero tolerance on 'Trolling', ie comments not helpful to the debate but made in order to provoke an adverse reaction from other posters. Your "tripe" post clearly is against these two "rules", for me, I'm afraid. And I wonder how many times I’ve been attacked as the poster....hundreds of times at a guess !!! And by many different people on here too, it works two ways you know. Or it should,but in my case it obviously doesn’t. And that, even if remotely true, gives you the right, does it?
|
|
Yotes
Forum Admin
Posts: 16,425
|
Post by Yotes on Oct 25, 2021 14:31:14 GMT
Insert Ron Burgundy gif here.
The tripe comment is clearly against the rules, and should've been seen earlier and censured. It's our mistake for missing it, and I'm sorry Mary has felt it necessary to leave the forum.
It does help us if people use the Report Post functionality, as this clearly flags the posts to us. I know some of you have used that in the past, and I can assure you that even if we decide the post is ok, the reports are not ignored, so please use that where necessary.
The warning function has always had little effect when used in the past (badge of honour), so in future we'll be immediately using varying lengths of bans where necessary, ranging from days to permanent exclusions, this will be at the discretion of the mods.
As a final point, this will apply to everyone equally. Instigation and retaliation will both be judged on the same terms, so sometimes please count to ten, and report the post.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2021 15:06:02 GMT
2) If you disagree with a post, attack the content rather than the author. We're all grown-ups, show proper respect to other posters. 3) We operate zero tolerance on 'Trolling', ie comments not helpful to the debate but made in order to provoke an adverse reaction from other posters. Your "tripe" post clearly is against these two "rules", for me, I'm afraid. Attack the content rather than the poster eh? I've said numerous things on here which duplicate what other posters have said over the years but I get quoted etc because its me..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2021 15:07:13 GMT
2) If you disagree with a post, attack the content rather than the author. We're all grown-ups, show proper respect to other posters. 3) We operate zero tolerance on 'Trolling', ie comments not helpful to the debate but made in order to provoke an adverse reaction from other posters. Your "tripe" post clearly is against these two "rules", for me, I'm afraid. And I wonder how many times I’ve been attacked as the poster....hundreds of times at a guess !!! And by many different people on here too, it works two ways you know. Or it should,but in my case it obviously doesn’t. Exactly same with me!
|
|
|
Post by nightwish on Oct 25, 2021 17:30:23 GMT
2) If you disagree with a post, attack the content rather than the author. We're all grown-ups, show proper respect to other posters. 3) We operate zero tolerance on 'Trolling', ie comments not helpful to the debate but made in order to provoke an adverse reaction from other posters. Your "tripe" post clearly is against these two "rules", for me, I'm afraid. Hit the nail on the head - attack the content not the poster - unless of course Simms posts anything but he is the exception because his a complete wan…..
|
|
Higgy
Les Strongman
Posts: 5,293
|
Post by Higgy on Oct 25, 2021 18:10:41 GMT
This thread has again shown me the reason why I rarely visit this forum anymore. Sad times
|
|
|
Post by blackandgold73 on Oct 25, 2021 19:03:19 GMT
This thread has again shown me the reason why I rarely visit this forum anymore. Sad times I'm sorry to hear that Higgy. Hope you'll feel like you can give it a second chance. After many years I stepped away for a year I got so frustrated and disheartened by the forum but I'm giving it a second go. Hope you'll join those of us who have drifted back for a second chance
|
|
Yotes
Forum Admin
Posts: 16,425
|
Post by Yotes on Oct 25, 2021 22:36:02 GMT
so don't go on about attacking the content BS Referring to another post as "BS" is the sort of thing that's going to stop. Please consider this the last example, for everyone not just Pidge. The rules will be implemented the same way for everyone.
|
|
|
Post by messier1851 on Oct 26, 2021 18:56:10 GMT
Meanwhile, back at the plot, I see the highlights are back up to snuff. What was the point of showing Matheson being shoved in the back at 3.00? It wasn't even a penalty was it? Two seconds of buildup to the Latal goal, four seconds for the Carozza goal? Are they on a time budget? Agreed, I don't want to keep picking at this but again they felt really rushed, coming in halfway through commentators sentences, weird short clips that seemingly have no relevance and aren't referred to in any way. I get it, highlights editing is a skill, I've done plenty of it myself and it can be really tough if you don't have many angles to work with and if the commentators talk non-stop it can be hard to find clean in and out points. Is there a time budget like you say? Personally I'd rather watch a good 10-12 minute production than a ham-fisted six minutes. The Latal goal clip is just bizarre, literally here he is, puck, net. Sorry to keep having a moan up and if anyone is reading I'm really happy to offer any advice or at least to learn more about the process so that perhaps I can make a more informed judgement. Oh and great to see Domingue score again, two GWG's in a week, good lad.
|
|
|
Post by bobness on Nov 6, 2021 16:39:10 GMT
Bit of a long shot here, anyone know who was on ice for Panthers when Latal scored the shorty? I have 12/74/94 from the highlights, but can't see anything else in the 3 nanoseconds they give the goal. Even with only 3 of 5, though, that puts me exactly 3 in front of the gamesheet...
|
|
|
Post by blackandgold73 on Nov 6, 2021 17:15:16 GMT
Bit of a long shot here, anyone know who was on ice for Panthers when Latal scored the shorty? I have 12/74/94 from the highlights, but can't see anything else in the 3 nanoseconds they give the goal. Even with only 3 of 5, though, that puts me exactly 3 in front of the gamesheet... Unless I've made a mistake... Domingue ends the game +1 despite having been on the ice for 2 of our 3 goals. Right? But *isn't listed as being on the ice for their first goal* so that would suggest to me he had to be on the ice for Latal's yes? Anyone whose +/- corresponds to events that are recorded (there's a couple) can be ruled out. Beyond that you'd have to run the possibilities I fear. Sorry that's the best I can do. Don't know if a process of elimination will get you to a final result for others but that's all I could think of as a possible partial solution in the absence of footage.
|
|