|
Post by wannabe2 on Apr 16, 2021 19:35:56 GMT
If you lose your helmet for any reason you have to get off the ice, everyone is made aware of that it’s a safety thing, and is penalised if not followed.
|
|
|
Post by kievthegreat on Apr 16, 2021 19:36:26 GMT
I guess the rules are different in England. When you rip an opponent's helmet off it's not a penalty. I feel for Cangelosi. I feel he's been on the end of 2 annoying decisions. First is him and Waller both grabbing at each other but Waller getting himself clear when the Refs look. Then as you say, the Steelers takes his lid off, but the ref only see the helmet on the floor.
|
|
|
Post by wannabe2 on Apr 16, 2021 19:44:32 GMT
4-2 now next goal is huge.
|
|
|
Post by bobness on Apr 16, 2021 19:47:28 GMT
If you lose your helmet for any reason you have to get off the ice, everyone is made aware of that it’s a safety thing, and is penalised if not followed. But his penalty was for holding...
|
|
|
Post by The Flying Shirt on Apr 16, 2021 20:05:36 GMT
We won... just off to change my pants...
|
|
|
Post by bobness on Apr 16, 2021 20:05:45 GMT
That’s the definition of a dirty win.
|
|
|
Post by wannabe2 on Apr 16, 2021 20:10:57 GMT
Great win, well played Panthers tough game big time, Steelers in fairness don’t know when they are beat, and never gave up recipe for success.
|
|
|
Post by floridadad on Apr 16, 2021 20:16:59 GMT
If you lose your helmet for any reason you have to get off the ice, everyone is made aware of that it’s a safety thing, and is penalised if not followed. So no penalty for the guy who ripped the helmet off. And the call was holding. If anything it should have been delay of game. Refs really should get a refresher course. Some will get hurt out there to the refs negligence.
|
|
|
Post by wgray on Apr 16, 2021 20:22:20 GMT
Finally, a victory against them lot at the NIC, pleased with that.
There was always going to be pressure from Sheffield in the 2nd and 3rd, being down by 4 they had nothing to lose so they came out with their guns blazing. Bowns made some big saves and there was some great blocks from the defence to prevent goals being scored. Sheffield’s forwards love to redirect the puck from in front, our forwards put their body on the line and made the blocks to stop the puck getting through, we defended superbly as a team.
Surprisingly, not a single powerplay for us tonight, we didn’t need it though as we were clinical and aggressive in the offensive zone. Hopefully we continue to play like this tomorrow.
|
|
|
Post by kievthegreat on Apr 16, 2021 22:23:52 GMT
If you lose your helmet for any reason you have to get off the ice, everyone is made aware of that it’s a safety thing, and is penalised if not followed. But his penalty was for holding... This makes it kind of worse. If he was penalised for holding as the gamesheet suggests (didn't hear what Stef called), surely he should get a 2nd minor for playing without a helmet? Either way we get the win, no matter how dirty.
|
|
iginla
Chick Zamick
Posts: 13,484
|
Post by iginla on Apr 16, 2021 23:06:24 GMT
Good win that. Swop the goalies and different story though, Bowns was the difference.
|
|
|
Post by bobness on Apr 17, 2021 5:27:05 GMT
Good win that. Swop the goalies and different story though, Bowns was the difference. Like he was the other night?
|
|
iginla
Chick Zamick
Posts: 13,484
|
Post by iginla on Apr 17, 2021 6:53:22 GMT
Good win that. Swop the goalies and different story though, Bowns was the difference. Like he was the other night? I’ve no idea, I didn’t watch the other night. But from what I read the whole Panthers team were garbage the other night.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2021 8:22:46 GMT
Didn't panthers outshoot Steelers 2 to 1 last Saturday .. tells me clinical finishing and goalies were the difference..
|
|
|
Post by The Flying Shirt on Apr 17, 2021 10:03:25 GMT
Didn't panthers outshoot Steelers 2 to 1 last Saturday .. tells me clinical finishing and goalies were the difference.. Definitely the finishing and even last night there were several very good chances in the 2nd and 3rd that didn't put the game to bed and almost came back to bite us.
|
|
|
Post by bobness on Apr 17, 2021 14:39:53 GMT
Like he was the other night? I’ve no idea, I didn’t watch the other night. But from what I read the whole Panthers team were garbage the other night. 5 goals from 10 shots was the difference then, but the opposite way than what it was last night (according to you, at least). Who's to say Whistle wouldn't have got a shut out last night? No-one knows that, that's just wishful thinking, "If my aunt had had balls she'd be my uncle", kind of stuff.
|
|
|
Post by bobness on Apr 17, 2021 14:40:40 GMT
Didn't panthers outshoot Steelers 2 to 1 last Saturday .. tells me clinical finishing and goalies were the difference.. Definitely the finishing and even last night there were several very good chances in the 2nd and 3rd that didn't put the game to bed and almost came back to bite us. Indeed, should have had 6 on the board, some great chances went begging.
|
|
|
Post by bobness on Apr 17, 2021 14:48:33 GMT
Didn't panthers outshoot Steelers 2 to 1 last Saturday .. tells me clinical finishing and goalies were the difference.. You just can't say that, though, can you? It was a completely different game, was the main difference. Every shot, every hit, every bounce, every face off. Every other stat was different, that was the difference. (Let alone the fact that Panthers haven't outshot Steelers 2 to 1 in any of the 3 games, let alone last Saturday. The best Panthers have had so far was 41 vs 24 in the opening game. Last Saturday it was 40 vs 33.)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2021 15:59:48 GMT
Here comes bobness arguing for arguing sake 😴
|
|
|
Post by blackandgold73 on Apr 17, 2021 21:47:09 GMT
Here comes bobness arguing for arguing sake 😴 Since when does bringing facts that completely undercut secondhand assertions (2 shots to one/I didn't watch but I heard...) count as arguing for arguing sake. Isn't that more what could be described as a reality check? Surely it would be just as easy to say 'Here comes XYZ trolling for trollings sake?' But, as always, JMHO
|
|
|
Post by bobness on Apr 18, 2021 7:55:14 GMT
Here comes bobness arguing for arguing sake 😴 Here comes pidge, who seemingly thinks that discussion forums should only involve people who agree with him, and that to question his posts is somehow not allowed. Is something I could retort with. If I wanted to. Indeed I was only pointing out that the “2 to 1” “fact” wasn't at all, and that to just say “the goalie and finishing were the difference” is a gross oversimplification. IMHO of course. That’s the “discussion” bit of “discussion forums”. Say something I agree with and I’ll absolutely agree with you. It’s not personal. It’s debate and discussion, during which I always find the odd pertinent fact is useful, nay instructive.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2021 19:14:19 GMT
Here comes bobness arguing for arguing sake 😴 Here comes pidge, who seemingly thinks that discussion forums should only involve people who agree with him, and that to question his posts is somehow not allowed. Is something I could retort with. If I wanted to. Indeed I was only pointing out that the “2 to 1” “fact” wasn't at all, and that to just say “the goalie and finishing were the difference” is a gross oversimplification. IMHO of course. That’s the “discussion” bit of “discussion forums”. Say something I agree with and I’ll absolutely agree with you. It’s not personal. It’s debate and discussion, during which I always find the odd pertinent fact is useful, nay instructive. And that's where you are soo wrong .. I never stated 2 shots to 1 was fact! As I don't follow games religiously like some do on here.
|
|
|
Post by bobness on Apr 19, 2021 19:39:32 GMT
Here comes pidge, who seemingly thinks that discussion forums should only involve people who agree with him, and that to question his posts is somehow not allowed. Is something I could retort with. If I wanted to. Indeed I was only pointing out that the “2 to 1” “fact” wasn't at all, and that to just say “the goalie and finishing were the difference” is a gross oversimplification. IMHO of course. That’s the “discussion” bit of “discussion forums”. Say something I agree with and I’ll absolutely agree with you. It’s not personal. It’s debate and discussion, during which I always find the odd pertinent fact is useful, nay instructive. And that's where you are soo wrong .. I never stated 2 shots to 1 was fact! As I don't follow games religiously like some do on here. I know, that’s why I put the word fact in inverted commas. As for following games religiously, this is a forum for fans of a sports team. I’d hope some of its members do indeed follow games religiously, otherwise it’s just ill informed people shouting at each other?
|
|