|
Post by PantherTom on Dec 1, 2013 12:27:41 GMT
For checking to the head.
In my opinion the contact was with the shoulder not the head Davies played next shift! Was late though so maybe deserved 1 game
Yet when keefe clearly elbows conboy to the head and he has to be taken off on a stretcher he gets 3 games?! And downgraded to charging
|
|
|
Post by panthertom93 on Dec 1, 2013 12:35:02 GMT
|
|
iginla
Chick Zamick
Posts: 13,422
|
Post by iginla on Dec 1, 2013 12:40:47 GMT
That is not a great hit,but he doesn't hit his head,Jensens elbow makes contact with Davies arm 6 inches below his shoulder.
It shouldn't be a 3 game ban that's ridiculous.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2013 12:42:42 GMT
Jensens shoulder hits Davies right in the face. I'm sorry but we can't have any complaints about that, it's a check to the head and the ban is deserved.
|
|
|
Post by Carnell on Dec 1, 2013 12:52:49 GMT
It's the minimum tariff for a checking to the head! Can't argue with the ban, I called it last night watching the game!
Luckily we have two bodies back tonight! But going to miss Jensen
|
|
|
Post by PantherTom on Dec 1, 2013 12:53:58 GMT
It's the minimum tariff for a checking to the head! Can't argue with the ban, I called it last night watching the game! Luckily we have two bodies back tonight! But going to miss Jensen But it's not a check to the head so should be less I think is people a point
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2013 12:57:44 GMT
It's the minimum tariff for a checking to the head! Can't argue with the ban, I called it last night watching the game! Luckily we have two bodies back tonight! But going to miss Jensen But it's not a check to the head so should be less I think is people a point it's clearly a check to the head. Jensen's shoulder makes contact with Davies' face.
|
|
5+game
Terry Kurtenbach
Posts: 2,974
|
Post by 5+game on Dec 1, 2013 13:04:27 GMT
But it's not a check to the head so should be less I think is people a point it's clearly a check to the head. Jensen's shoulder makes contact with Davies' face. Exactly how i saw it. I was fuming with him when i saw it as i knew strait away he would get a ban for it.
|
|
|
Post by kezypanther on Dec 1, 2013 13:08:25 GMT
For me it's the right call he does make contact to the head from the video. Just don't like the inconstancy, keefes hit was worse for me and only got given one extra game. Yet he deliberately targets the head with the elbow and knocks the guy out :/. He should have got 5 for that at least. Then Jensens will be 3 games.
|
|
|
Post by panthersnation on Dec 1, 2013 13:11:26 GMT
For checking to the head. In my opinion the contact was with the shoulder not the head Davies played next shift! Was late though so maybe deserved 1 game Yet when keefe clearly elbows conboy to the head and he has to be taken off on a stretcher he gets 3 games?! And downgraded to charging it is a check to the head no complaints here
|
|
Pies
Forum Moderator
Reluctant Chief of ITK
Posts: 4,879
|
Post by Pies on Dec 1, 2013 13:57:50 GMT
Clear check to the head. 3 games is the right ban. It's just frustrating that we're shooting ourselves in the foot with all these bans.
|
|
|
Post by pantherdman on Dec 1, 2013 14:06:44 GMT
So Davies has to miss 3 games also to ensure he doesn't have concussion right?
Did the ref even call a penalty on the hit? I could scrutinise a game and probably find 5 or 6 reasons for suspension every time. Let the game be decided on the ice.
What happened with that caps player who drove one of our players head first into the boards??? Nothing. Twice as bad as that hit.
Yet I'm robbed of seeing a full squad for another 3 games, yet still the same ticket price.
May as well get the Italian refs in.
|
|
|
Post by The Flying Shirt on Dec 1, 2013 14:14:37 GMT
A slam dunk and absolutely obvious.
|
|
Shorty
Paul Adey
Still here for Private Messages
Posts: 6,636
|
Post by Shorty on Dec 1, 2013 14:15:29 GMT
So Davies has to miss 3 games also to ensure he doesn't have concussion right? Did the ref even call a penalty on the hit? I could scrutinise a game and probably find 5 or 6 reasons for suspension every time. Let the game be decided on the ice. What happened with that caps player who drove one of our players head first into the boards??? Nothing. Twice as bad as that hit. Yet I'm robbed of seeing a full squad for another 3 games, yet still the same ticket price. May as well get the Italian refs in. Good grief
|
|
|
Post by panthermatt on Dec 1, 2013 14:33:09 GMT
I think Jensen certainly deserves his ban but also the note about the Caps player is a very good one as the hit on Murray was just as bad as Tuuka's against the Steelers but the one on Murray was not even called as a penalty. I think this is possibly because the Panthers did not request suplimentary disapline on the hit but again it comes down to a lack of consistency.
|
|
|
Post by The Flying Shirt on Dec 1, 2013 14:43:26 GMT
Murray spoke to the ref straight away and said it was an accident.
|
|
|
Post by sameagain on Dec 1, 2013 14:44:13 GMT
No consistency from Hanson, looks like he might be leaving his mark on the way hockey goes in the future.Not the way to go imo.
|
|
|
Post by bobness on Dec 1, 2013 14:53:45 GMT
You can't fight a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent.
|
|
|
Post by pantherdman on Dec 1, 2013 15:10:16 GMT
Did the devils actually ask for a review? Would have thought they would have more pressing matters to spend their money on, like keeping their club afloat?
Checks like that happen every game, never get 3 game bans handed out.
No consistency what so ever. Should be down to the ref what gets reviewed not the £
|
|
|
Post by joesteeler on Dec 1, 2013 15:26:54 GMT
Did the devils actually ask for a review? Would have thought they would have more pressing matters to spend their money on, like keeping their club afloat? Checks like that happen every game, never get 3 game bans handed out. No consistency what so ever. Should be down to the ref what gets reviewed not the £ You are the most one eyed fan I have ever seen on a forum board. Everyone else ( including your fans ) have the seen it for what it actually is. A check to the head. It seems like your motto is "panthers can do no wrong"
|
|
|
Post by pantherdman on Dec 1, 2013 16:10:35 GMT
Motto is: hockey has gone soft.
I'd be more worried about your own club mate, they're full strength woeful
|
|
|
Post by The Flying Shirt on Dec 1, 2013 16:42:34 GMT
Motto is: hockey has gone soft. I'd be more worried about your own club mate, they're full strength woeful Yes and we are looking brilliant so far lol
|
|
dp
Jim Keyes
Posts: 966
|
Post by dp on Dec 1, 2013 19:12:28 GMT
Can't really argue with the call because he does check his head - you could probably argue that it means that it's pretty much impossible to check Davies though, but that's a different matter.
What annoys me is the TOTAL lack of consistency. We have Makela getting a two game ban on the back of a review requested by Sheffield - later that week Dowd is in his own paper saying it was an accident.
And then we get Suderman (and plenty of others) getting away scot-free for doing exactly the same as Henley did to Spencer.
Hanson is having a massively unhealthy influence on the league this year. We obviously have to have a review system, but at the moment it's like a random number generator.
The players look to have no idea where they stand or what's acceptable - and that's not good for anyone, least of all the fans.
|
|
|
Post by bobness on Dec 1, 2013 19:28:59 GMT
Motto is: hockey has gone soft. I'd be more worried about your own club mate, they're full strength woeful Woeful enough to beat us 5-0. Wake up and smell the coffee.
|
|
Dan
Forum Admin
Boss
Posts: 5,891
|
Post by Dan on Dec 1, 2013 19:48:48 GMT
Did the devils actually ask for a review? Would have thought they would have more pressing matters to spend their money on, like keeping their club afloat? Checks like that happen every game, never get 3 game bans handed out. No consistency what so ever. Should be down to the ref what gets reviewed not the £ I can't understand anyone thinking we got hard done by here. Clear, clear hit to the head. Lucky to only be 3 games. If we have the luxury when he returns, we ought to sit him for more. A disgraceful hit when you're already short-benched.
|
|