|
Post by PantherB on May 29, 2016 9:57:27 GMT
The more coaches, the easier it becomes to manage the team.
With Corey, if he coached on his own i doubt we'd ever progress on the ice, he's a great coach but no coach can do a job on their own. Throw Strachan into the mix and we get his coaching and tactical knowledge which he can share with Corey, who can also share his ideas and together they can work together to formulate various strategies based on what they know, it gives more options and when in training it means the team can split into two groups so it's more manageable for the coaches and a more personal session for the players. Now, with Clarke, he's played for a long time and will have his own ideas of tactics and can give an input on who should play what role, play in what position etc.. as he'd actually out there on the ice and how others play will affect how he plays. Clarke will share his thoughts, learn from Corey and Strax and who knows.. Between them they might come up with a plan which is very successful. Obviously during training sessions, as well as taking part in drills, Clarke can lead them without the supervision of Strax and Corey so they have more time to spend with other players.
It's a great appointment in my eyes and can only be an improvement on an already very successful coaching team. There's a reason NHL and higher profile teams have a handful, and more, Assistant Coaches.
Clarke his given sweat, blood and tears for the club too.. He is the face of the Panthers and one of the best British players to have played, he is more than deserving of a shot at helping out with coaching, he spends pretty much his entire summer coaching kids and begginers, he knows how to treat people well and influence them the best he can. One thing i would like to happen is for Panthers to push, along with Steelers and Thompson for an u20's league/feeder league. Clarke would excell in that area, coaches all around the country and would, i'm sure, love to bring together a roster of the highest potential kids he's taught. Throw his lad in there, and the older Neilson Jr. and in regards to British players.. We're set for the future. If we had such a thing then when we go on these European Trips like to Amiens, arrange for each teams u20's team to come along as well and have another tournament, i know Amiens has two ice pads and it'd make the weekend even better.
I hope Clarke can put forward such ideas as in my eyes, he has more experience coaching kids and youngsters so it'd be a massive miss if we was to not utilise his further skillsets.
|
|
|
Post by panthermatt on May 29, 2016 10:28:34 GMT
I think the point the previous poster was trying to make is that with clark being made an assistant coach that only half of his wages or some percentage count towards the "salary" Cap and that in theory frees up some more money from there.
|
|
|
Post by kievthegreat on May 29, 2016 10:35:38 GMT
I think the point the previous poster was trying to make is that with clark being made an assistant coach that only half of his wages or some percentage count towards the "salary" Cap and that in theory frees up some more money from there. But there isn't a salary cap. Black is a businessman, surely he'll not care if it's Coach or Player salary, he'd only be concerned with how much money is being spent total. Unless we think that GM is looking to con Black into spending more money on the Panthers?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2016 11:36:17 GMT
Can't for the life of me see why on earth we need a third coach.......it's just another way of hiding some wage money ! Potentially the only way we could get him to sign.
|
|
iginla
Chick Zamick
Posts: 13,484
|
Post by iginla on May 29, 2016 16:49:58 GMT
Can't for the life of me see why on earth we need a third coach.......it's just another way of hiding some wage money ! Potentially the only way we could get him to sign. Extra import = British players are now less valuable. Black hates paying big money to Brits. So because of the extra import Black cuts Brit wages and that's why we are struggling to keep them. Give Clarkey an extra role = can pay him more. That's what I mean by hiding wages !
|
|
|
Post by PantherB on May 29, 2016 17:03:14 GMT
Potentially the only way we could get him to sign. Extra import = British players are now less valuable. Black hates paying big money to Brits. So because of the extra import Black cuts Brit wages and that's why we are struggling to keep them. Give Clarkey an extra role = can pay him more. That's what I mean by hiding wages ! Then why haven't we struggled to keep Clarke in his entire career? Of the Brits we've lost, non have been monitary issues. Swindlehurst left due to what i can only assume was a fallout with management, Myers left because he rightly put family before hockey. I wouldn't expect Clarke to be getting paid more either, he knows he isn't the player he used to be, but still wants to contribute and try and learn as much as possible coaching wise so theoretically you'd expect him to be on the same wage or less, someone's cocked up big time if he's on significantly more than previously. The only issue's i've ever heard around wages was that rumour of Salters leaving for Clan due to £50 a week difference which Panthers wouldn't pay.. True? Who knows. Other than that, there's just those suggestions from Cody Wild and Colby Cohen who were said to have left their accomodation in a state or left bills unpaid, therefore not recieving their full, final pay cheque. Black is a business man, Panthers are his priority and he is far from the stupidity of not wanting to pay someone much because of their nationality. You need Brits to do well in the Elite League, without them you're unlikely to get much more than 3 solid lines of forwards and defence, that isn't the way you go about things when you intend to be challenging for silverware.
|
|
iginla
Chick Zamick
Posts: 13,484
|
Post by iginla on May 29, 2016 18:20:04 GMT
Extra import = British players are now less valuable. Black hates paying big money to Brits. So because of the extra import Black cuts Brit wages and that's why we are struggling to keep them. Give Clarkey an extra role = can pay him more. That's what I mean by hiding wages ! Then why haven't we struggled to keep Clarke in his entire career? Of the Brits we've lost, non have been monitary issues. Swindlehurst left due to what i can only assume was a fallout with management, Myers left because he rightly put family before hockey. I wouldn't expect Clarke to be getting paid more either, he knows he isn't the player he used to be, but still wants to contribute and try and learn as much as possible coaching wise so theoretically you'd expect him to be on the same wage or less, someone's cocked up big time if he's on significantly more than previously. The only issue's i've ever heard around wages was that rumour of Salters leaving for Clan due to £50 a week difference which Panthers wouldn't pay.. True? Who knows. Other than that, there's just those suggestions from Cody Wild and Colby Cohen who were said to have left their accomodation in a state or left bills unpaid, therefore not recieving their full, final pay cheque. Black is a business man, Panthers are his priority and he is far from the stupidity of not wanting to pay someone much because of their nationality. You need Brits to do well in the Elite League, without them you're unlikely to get much more than 3 solid lines of forwards and defence, that isn't the way you go about things when you intend to be challenging for silverware. We haven't struggled to keep him because a. He is very loyal b. Because we paid him very well and c. Because we had to pay him well as we needed Brits. It's only about four years ago we were at a max of 10 imports,we are now at 14 and every time the import limit increases then the Brits become less valuable. Black is a businessman yes,but he would prefer a league full of imports,the more the better as far as he is concerned. Why does he want that......because imports of the same standard are far cheaper than Brits. It's supply and demand,we have previously needed Brits and they could demand the daft money because there were so few of them,but now they aren't in such a strong position because with 14 imports you can basically put a decent team on the ice with just them and a couple of average Brits.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2016 18:37:15 GMT
Potentially the only way we could get him to sign. So because of the extra import Black cuts Brit wages and that's why we are struggling to keep them. Really? Like who?
|
|
|
Post by PantherB on May 29, 2016 18:58:38 GMT
Then why haven't we struggled to keep Clarke in his entire career? Of the Brits we've lost, non have been monitary issues. Swindlehurst left due to what i can only assume was a fallout with management, Myers left because he rightly put family before hockey. I wouldn't expect Clarke to be getting paid more either, he knows he isn't the player he used to be, but still wants to contribute and try and learn as much as possible coaching wise so theoretically you'd expect him to be on the same wage or less, someone's cocked up big time if he's on significantly more than previously. The only issue's i've ever heard around wages was that rumour of Salters leaving for Clan due to £50 a week difference which Panthers wouldn't pay.. True? Who knows. Other than that, there's just those suggestions from Cody Wild and Colby Cohen who were said to have left their accomodation in a state or left bills unpaid, therefore not recieving their full, final pay cheque. Black is a business man, Panthers are his priority and he is far from the stupidity of not wanting to pay someone much because of their nationality. You need Brits to do well in the Elite League, without them you're unlikely to get much more than 3 solid lines of forwards and defence, that isn't the way you go about things when you intend to be challenging for silverware. We haven't struggled to keep him because a. He is very loyal b. Because we paid him very well and c. Because we had to pay him well as we needed Brits. It's only about four years ago we were at a max of 10 imports,we are now at 14 and every time the import limit increases then the Brits become less valuable. Black is a businessman yes,but he would prefer a league full of imports,the more the better as far as he is concerned. Why does he want that......because imports of the same standard are far cheaper than Brits. It's supply and demand,we have previously needed Brits and they could demand the daft money because there were so few of them,but now they aren't in such a strong position because with 14 imports you can basically put a decent team on the ice with just them and a couple of average Brits. Senior Brits become more valuable with import numbers rising, you need at least 17 players to be competitive, with 14 imports, you need at least 3 good brits to fill in the spots and their value increases due to such high demand for them and the importance their presence will have. Imports get paid less (depending who it is) because all expenses are paid for them, flights, equipment, insurance, accomodation.. Things nearly all Brits won't have included in their contract so rightly so, some Brits demand more money. Black is smart and he knows that without Brits, the EIHL would be dead. There's been quite a lack in talent who can make the step up to the Elite League, meaning we have to increase Import numbers for the time being. Give it 3 or 4 more years and i'd expect, and hope that the import limit is reduced by 1 and then 2 again.
|
|
iginla
Chick Zamick
Posts: 13,484
|
Post by iginla on May 29, 2016 20:54:38 GMT
We haven't struggled to keep him because a. He is very loyal b. Because we paid him very well and c. Because we had to pay him well as we needed Brits. It's only about four years ago we were at a max of 10 imports,we are now at 14 and every time the import limit increases then the Brits become less valuable. Black is a businessman yes,but he would prefer a league full of imports,the more the better as far as he is concerned. Why does he want that......because imports of the same standard are far cheaper than Brits. It's supply and demand,we have previously needed Brits and they could demand the daft money because there were so few of them,but now they aren't in such a strong position because with 14 imports you can basically put a decent team on the ice with just them and a couple of average Brits. Senior Brits become more valuable with import numbers rising, you need at least 17 players to be competitive, with 14 imports, you need at least 3 good brits to fill in the spots and their value increases due to such high demand for them and the importance their presence will have. Imports get paid less (depending who it is) because all expenses are paid for them, flights, equipment, insurance, accomodation.. Things nearly all Brits won't have included in their contract so rightly so, some Brits demand more money. Black is smart and he knows that without Brits, the EIHL would be dead. There's been quite a lack in talent who can make the step up to the Elite League, meaning we have to increase Import numbers for the time being. Give it 3 or 4 more years and i'd expect, and hope that the import limit is reduced by 1 and then 2 again. Rubbish. So you are saying a Brit pays for his own equipment,insurance and accommodation,of course he doesn't ! There may be the odd Brit who has a house here but in general the only extra expense of an import over a Brit is flights and paperwork. Why would the EIHL be dead without Brits,good ones cost teams more money than an import of the same quality,that's not just me saying that,there are plenty of words already written or spoken about that issue. And I would love to see where all these quality Brits you mention are coming from in 3 or 4 years,because I can't see them. If the import limit dropped by two you would need a heck of a lot lot of them to come through very quickly and don't forget by then a lot of the current crop like Clarkey,Tait,Shields etc will have retired,so that's even more you would need. The reason the standard of the EIHL is being regularly quoted as greatly improved is not down to the Brits,it's because we now have 40 (yes 40) more imports in the league than we did four years ago !
|
|
|
Post by texpef on May 30, 2016 8:04:47 GMT
The more coaches, the easier it becomes to manage the team.
With Corey, if he coached on his own i doubt we'd ever progress on the ice, he's a great coach but no coach can do a job on their own. Throw Strachan into the mix and we get his coaching and tactical knowledge which he can share with Corey, who can also share his ideas and together they can work together to formulate various strategies based on what they know, it gives more options and when in training it means the team can split into two groups so it's more manageable for the coaches and a more personal session for the players. Now, with Clarke, he's played for a long time and will have his own ideas of tactics and can give an input on who should play what role, play in what position etc.. as he'd actually out there on the ice and how others play will affect how he plays. Clarke will share his thoughts, learn from Corey and Strax and who knows.. Between them they might come up with a plan which is very successful. Obviously during training sessions, as well as taking part in drills, Clarke can lead them without the supervision of Strax and Corey so they have more time to spend with other players. It's a great appointment in my eyes and can only be an improvement on an already very successful coaching team. There's a reason NHL and higher profile teams have a handful, and more, Assistant Coaches. Clarke his given sweat, blood and tears for the club too.. He is the face of the Panthers and one of the best British players to have played, he is more than deserving of a shot at helping out with coaching, he spends pretty much his entire summer coaching kids and begginers, he knows how to treat people well and influence them the best he can. One thing i would like to happen is for Panthers to push, along with Steelers and Thompson for an u20's league/feeder league. Clarke would excell in that area, coaches all around the country and would, i'm sure, love to bring together a roster of the highest potential kids he's taught. Throw his lad in there, and the older Neilson Jr. and in regards to British players.. We're set for the future. If we had such a thing then when we go on these European Trips like to Amiens, arrange for each teams u20's team to come along as well and have another tournament, i know Amiens has two ice pads and it'd make the weekend even better. I hope Clarke can put forward such ideas as in my eyes, he has more experience coaching kids and youngsters so it'd be a massive miss if we was to not utilise his further skillsets. Obviously never been in full time employment... more managers generally just means more points of view, which the staff then have to accommodate, hardly ever an improvement in moral or working conditions..
|
|
|
Post by texpef on May 30, 2016 8:11:10 GMT
Extra import = British players are now less valuable. Black hates paying big money to Brits. So because of the extra import Black cuts Brit wages and that's why we are struggling to keep them. Give Clarkey an extra role = can pay him more. That's what I mean by hiding wages ! Then why haven't we struggled to keep Clarke in his entire career? Of the Brits we've lost, non have been monitary issues. Swindlehurst left due to what i can only assume was a fallout with management, Myers left because he rightly put family before hockey. I wouldn't expect Clarke to be getting paid more either, he knows he isn't the player he used to be, but still wants to contribute and try and learn as much as possible coaching wise so theoretically you'd expect him to be on the same wage or less, someone's cocked up big time if he's on significantly more than previously. The only issue's i've ever heard around wages was that rumour of Salters leaving for Clan due to £50 a week difference which Panthers wouldn't pay.. True? Who knows. Other than that, there's just those suggestions from Cody Wild and Colby Cohen who were said to have left their accomodation in a state or left bills unpaid, therefore not recieving their full, final pay cheque. Black is a business man, Panthers are his priority and he is far from the stupidity of not wanting to pay someone much because of their nationality. You need Brits to do well in the Elite League, without them you're unlikely to get much more than 3 solid lines of forwards and defence, that isn't the way you go about things when you intend to be challenging for silverware. It was stated in the press that Weaver left panthers for a pay rise in the BNL along with a crop of other players..
|
|
iginla
Chick Zamick
Posts: 13,484
|
Post by iginla on May 30, 2016 8:14:21 GMT
The more coaches, the easier it becomes to manage the team.
With Corey, if he coached on his own i doubt we'd ever progress on the ice, he's a great coach but no coach can do a job on their own. Throw Strachan into the mix and we get his coaching and tactical knowledge which he can share with Corey, who can also share his ideas and together they can work together to formulate various strategies based on what they know, it gives more options and when in training it means the team can split into two groups so it's more manageable for the coaches and a more personal session for the players. Now, with Clarke, he's played for a long time and will have his own ideas of tactics and can give an input on who should play what role, play in what position etc.. as he'd actually out there on the ice and how others play will affect how he plays. Clarke will share his thoughts, learn from Corey and Strax and who knows.. Between them they might come up with a plan which is very successful. Obviously during training sessions, as well as taking part in drills, Clarke can lead them without the supervision of Strax and Corey so they have more time to spend with other players. It's a great appointment in my eyes and can only be an improvement on an already very successful coaching team. There's a reason NHL and higher profile teams have a handful, and more, Assistant Coaches. Clarke his given sweat, blood and tears for the club too.. He is the face of the Panthers and one of the best British players to have played, he is more than deserving of a shot at helping out with coaching, he spends pretty much his entire summer coaching kids and begginers, he knows how to treat people well and influence them the best he can. One thing i would like to happen is for Panthers to push, along with Steelers and Thompson for an u20's league/feeder league. Clarke would excell in that area, coaches all around the country and would, i'm sure, love to bring together a roster of the highest potential kids he's taught. Throw his lad in there, and the older Neilson Jr. and in regards to British players.. We're set for the future. If we had such a thing then when we go on these European Trips like to Amiens, arrange for each teams u20's team to come along as well and have another tournament, i know Amiens has two ice pads and it'd make the weekend even better. I hope Clarke can put forward such ideas as in my eyes, he has more experience coaching kids and youngsters so it'd be a massive miss if we was to not utilise his further skillsets. Obviously never been in full time employment... more managers generally just means more points of view, which the staff then have to accommodate, hardly ever an improvement in moral or working conditions.. Mmmm.....and the phrase "too many cooks spoil the broth" springs to mind !
|
|
|
Post by thebestpanthers on May 30, 2016 8:40:42 GMT
Obviously never been in full time employment... more managers generally just means more points of view, which the staff then have to accommodate, hardly ever an improvement in moral or working conditions.. Mmmm.....and the phrase "too many cooks spoil the broth" springs to mind ! On the other hand it could be that each coach then deals with particular aspects of the player development, thus improving that particular skill - I.e. one coach concentrates on PK skills and takes a small group on training for this, whilst another concentrates on PP skills with another small group. Bit like one-to-one training. It may work, you never know you may be able to get each line training together (waits for usual suspects to remark about Cory changing lines) - but whatever you do don't wait till the start of the season to condemn the trial
|
|
|
Post by thebestpanthers on May 30, 2016 8:43:00 GMT
On another tract - there is a difference between a Manager and a Coach - a manager manages and a coach is a bus
|
|
|
Post by texpef on May 30, 2016 8:56:04 GMT
Mmmm.....and the phrase "too many cooks spoil the broth" springs to mind ! On the other hand it could be that each coach then deals with particular aspects of the player development, thus improving that particular skill - I.e. one coach concentrates on PK skills and takes a small group on training for this, whilst another concentrates on PP skills with another small group. Bit like one-to-one training. It may work, you never know you may be able to get each line training together (waits for usual suspects to remark about Cory changing lines) - but whatever you do don't wait till the start of the season to condemn the trial I see your point and I would agree that would be a way forward that would benefit all, however a small flaw is that none of the 3 "coaches/managers" are experts (from past experience ) in any of the areas you stated especially the PP. We did have one season where the PK was good but I suspect that was down to the players available i.e. Fox and co..
|
|
|
Post by PantherB on May 30, 2016 10:02:55 GMT
The more coaches, the easier it becomes to manage the team.
With Corey, if he coached on his own i doubt we'd ever progress on the ice, he's a great coach but no coach can do a job on their own. Throw Strachan into the mix and we get his coaching and tactical knowledge which he can share with Corey, who can also share his ideas and together they can work together to formulate various strategies based on what they know, it gives more options and when in training it means the team can split into two groups so it's more manageable for the coaches and a more personal session for the players. Now, with Clarke, he's played for a long time and will have his own ideas of tactics and can give an input on who should play what role, play in what position etc.. as he'd actually out there on the ice and how others play will affect how he plays. Clarke will share his thoughts, learn from Corey and Strax and who knows.. Between them they might come up with a plan which is very successful. Obviously during training sessions, as well as taking part in drills, Clarke can lead them without the supervision of Strax and Corey so they have more time to spend with other players. It's a great appointment in my eyes and can only be an improvement on an already very successful coaching team. There's a reason NHL and higher profile teams have a handful, and more, Assistant Coaches. Clarke his given sweat, blood and tears for the club too.. He is the face of the Panthers and one of the best British players to have played, he is more than deserving of a shot at helping out with coaching, he spends pretty much his entire summer coaching kids and begginers, he knows how to treat people well and influence them the best he can. One thing i would like to happen is for Panthers to push, along with Steelers and Thompson for an u20's league/feeder league. Clarke would excell in that area, coaches all around the country and would, i'm sure, love to bring together a roster of the highest potential kids he's taught. Throw his lad in there, and the older Neilson Jr. and in regards to British players.. We're set for the future. If we had such a thing then when we go on these European Trips like to Amiens, arrange for each teams u20's team to come along as well and have another tournament, i know Amiens has two ice pads and it'd make the weekend even better. I hope Clarke can put forward such ideas as in my eyes, he has more experience coaching kids and youngsters so it'd be a massive miss if we was to not utilise his further skillsets. Obviously never been in full time employment... more managers generally just means more points of view, which the staff then have to accommodate, hardly ever an improvement in moral or working conditions.. This, is hockey. Assistant Coaches have to listen to what the Head Coach wants, and train players accordingly. If an Assistant has a reccomendation then they discuss with the Head Coach. It's absolute rubbish that it's 'Hardly ever an improvement'. NHL Teams generally have 3 or 4 Assistant Coaches.. Take the Blackhawks for example, they have 2 Assistant Coaches, 1 Goaltending Coach and 1 Strength/Conditioning Coach.. Now tell me, does that go wrong? 3 Stanley Cups in the last 6 years says otherwise.
|
|
|
Post by The Flying Shirt on May 30, 2016 10:05:12 GMT
David has always wanted to get into the coaching side and does excellent work coaching the kids in the off season.
|
|
|
Post by The Flying Shirt on May 30, 2016 10:06:44 GMT
Then why haven't we struggled to keep Clarke in his entire career? Of the Brits we've lost, non have been monitary issues. Swindlehurst left due to what i can only assume was a fallout with management, Myers left because he rightly put family before hockey. I wouldn't expect Clarke to be getting paid more either, he knows he isn't the player he used to be, but still wants to contribute and try and learn as much as possible coaching wise so theoretically you'd expect him to be on the same wage or less, someone's cocked up big time if he's on significantly more than previously. The only issue's i've ever heard around wages was that rumour of Salters leaving for Clan due to £50 a week difference which Panthers wouldn't pay.. True? Who knows. Other than that, there's just those suggestions from Cody Wild and Colby Cohen who were said to have left their accomodation in a state or left bills unpaid, therefore not recieving their full, final pay cheque. Black is a business man, Panthers are his priority and he is far from the stupidity of not wanting to pay someone much because of their nationality. You need Brits to do well in the Elite League, without them you're unlikely to get much more than 3 solid lines of forwards and defence, that isn't the way you go about things when you intend to be challenging for silverware. It was stated in the press that Weaver left panthers for a pay rise in the BNL along with a crop of other players.. Bit of an unusual situation though with Weaver as he wanted less ice time and this came together at a point when one owner had a blank cheque in his hand.
|
|
|
Post by texpef on May 30, 2016 10:33:09 GMT
Obviously never been in full time employment... more managers generally just means more points of view, which the staff then have to accommodate, hardly ever an improvement in moral or working conditions.. This, is hockey. Assistant Coaches have to listen to what the Head Coach wants, and train players accordingly. If an Assistant has a reccomendation then they discuss with the Head Coach. It's absolute rubbish that it's 'Hardly ever an improvement'. NHL Teams generally have 3 or 4 Assistant Coaches.. Take the Blackhawks for example, they have 2 Assistant Coaches, 1 Goaltending Coach and 1 Strength/Conditioning Coach.. Now tell me, does that go wrong? 3 Stanley Cups in the last 6 years says otherwise. And you know this how? You cant possibly be comparing our backwater league to the best in the world are you... seriously?.. I think you will find ALL the NHL clubs have a similar setup therefore negating any advantage or otherwise one has over the rest, Blackhawks won as they had hot netminding and a team that played for each other oh and some stonking superstars bit like saying oh look Barcelona or Madrid won in the football because they had better training grounds... nothing to do with having the best players at all then... I am sure David will add to the overall package and hopefully be the difference in winning the league next season but in my experience of watching hockey (and sports in general) over the past half century or so its who ever has the best team (and mostly players) wins nothing more complicated than that..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2016 10:46:22 GMT
Why shouldn't the club aspire to emulate the best?
Frankly I find the negativity on here 3 months before a puck is dropped in anger is staggering.
|
|
|
Post by texpef on May 30, 2016 11:43:35 GMT
Not saying aspiration is wrong Jono but the kind of money spent in the NHL is like comparing Mansfield to Man united... nothing wrong with Mansfield wanting to run things as professionally as Man U but in reality they cant possibly get close.
If the club want to run more professionally (and lets be honest here its not the club comparing themselves to the NHL) there are alot more ways of improving than having a third coach on the staff who isn't specialised in any particular area (such as signing a semi retired import as a backup netminder who is then utilised as a goalie coach for the younger brits).
To be honest this isn't negativity imho its just a reality check, IF we had the money (which I don't believe we do) its very very unlikely our owner would spend it as history dictates he doesn't spend anywhere near what even fag packet figures suggests we could.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2016 13:52:03 GMT
So because of the extra import Black cuts Brit wages and that's why we are struggling to keep them. Really? Like who? Well?
|
|
Shorty
Paul Adey
Still here for Private Messages
Posts: 6,636
|
Post by Shorty on May 30, 2016 14:47:54 GMT
Why shouldn't the club aspire to emulate the best? Frankly I find the negativity on here 3 months before a puck is dropped in anger is staggering. It's standard for The Cage. You should know that by now Jono.
|
|
nate24
Greg Hadden
Posts: 1,415
|
Post by nate24 on May 30, 2016 15:04:15 GMT
Why shouldn't the club aspire to emulate the best? Frankly I find the negativity on here 3 months before a puck is dropped in anger is staggering. A lot of it is concerns rather than negativity. Corey has a coaching style that doesn't really seem to suit having another hand. He is indecisive as it is and I cannot see that changing with another assistant coach. I am sure though that everyone expressing concerns would be more than happy to be proved wrong but at the moment it is hard to see us being anything other than mediocre next season. I envy those that are happy with cups because our long game is in dire need of evolution.
|
|