|
Post by claretgiant on Nov 7, 2015 15:07:11 GMT
Waugh potentially back do that will sure up the D, player coming in (maybe) and Janssen nullifying Nickerson and Keefe, forwards have been scoring well. I can see us winning this one quite well, 5-2 panthers. Also be good to see Lloyd get caught with his head down by Janssen just for some clarification, if a Giants player catches Janssen with his head down you would be ok with that would you?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2015 15:10:48 GMT
Waugh potentially back do that will sure up the D, player coming in (maybe) and Janssen nullifying Nickerson and Keefe, forwards have been scoring well. I can see us winning this one quite well, 5-2 panthers. Also be good to see Lloyd get caught with his head down by Janssen just for some clarification, if a Giants player catches Janssen with his head down you would be ok with that would you? Would be amusing to see far the Giants player flew after such a collision so yes, I believe we are all fine with your proposed occurrence.
|
|
|
Post by panthersdave on Nov 7, 2015 15:19:54 GMT
Waugh potentially back do that will sure up the D, player coming in (maybe) and Janssen nullifying Nickerson and Keefe, forwards have been scoring well. I can see us winning this one quite well, 5-2 panthers. Also be good to see Lloyd get caught with his head down by Janssen just for some clarification, if a Giants player catches Janssen with his head down you would be ok with that would you? No, but Lloyd has been living a charmed life for a few years.
|
|
|
Post by jdizpt8 on Nov 7, 2015 17:06:00 GMT
Waugh potentially back do that will sure up the D, player coming in (maybe) and Janssen nullifying Nickerson and Keefe, forwards have been scoring well. I can see us winning this one quite well, 5-2 panthers. Also be good to see Lloyd get caught with his head down by Janssen just for some clarification, if a Giants player catches Janssen with his head down you would be ok with that would you? Yeah if it was a fair hit, I'm a hockey fan. If it was the cheap poo poo we see Lloyd throwing then hiding behind Keefe then no and I'd expect Janssen or any other player to drop the gloves
|
|
Shaggy
Forum Moderator
Am I a cynical idealist or an idealistic cynic?
Posts: 10,995
|
Post by Shaggy on Nov 7, 2015 17:13:27 GMT
Just seen the following on Facebook:-
|
|
|
Post by pantherlee on Nov 7, 2015 19:40:10 GMT
That was the best fight I've seen at the NIC in years
|
|
|
Post by allingtonskates on Nov 7, 2015 20:32:22 GMT
That was a bad knee it will probably be a ban.
|
|
Bolts
Pat Casey
Posts: 319
|
Post by Bolts on Nov 7, 2015 20:38:53 GMT
I'm behind the goal and I thought it looked a bad one but I'm miles away, everyone around me thinks it was a dive though.
Looked bad.
Great scrap between cam and keefe, cam just just edged for me by dropping keefe.
On another note, Belfast keep possession on power play so well.....compared to us.
|
|
Pies
Forum Moderator
Reluctant Chief of ITK
Posts: 4,879
|
Post by Pies on Nov 7, 2015 22:00:39 GMT
Great game with 2 great teams. Once again we come from behind and our offence explodes into life when you least expect it. Very happy with 2 points even happier that Belfast leave with none
|
|
|
Post by The Flying Shirt on Nov 7, 2015 22:08:21 GMT
Excellent result Panthers
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2015 22:12:07 GMT
Good game that. Belfast played a very tight style, felt it cost them in the third when they were defending their lead.
For all those criticising the ref last week you got the other version tonight with Hollywood Darnell missing & making calls all over the place for both teams. Was at the wrong end for the Ling knee so can't comment but he has this in his locker & we didn't seem to complain too much. DOPS will nail him to the stake no doubt. Expect 4 games at least.
Happy with both points & them taking none, they're a decent team.
|
|
|
Post by cooperphil156 on Nov 7, 2015 22:15:49 GMT
Great result after a mad minute, with Linger off and Bomhbach giving it away in a ridiculous area. Otherwise a good penalty period to not concede any more goals. For a second week a fighting comeback when they stepped it up in the 3rd period. Kolnik I like more and more with each game. I am not sure whether the absence of Oakford for much of the match was due to an injury or tactical. I also thought that Lacho and Stevie Lee were better this week. With regard to the scrap there seemed to be a lot of punching of thin air.
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Donkey on Nov 7, 2015 22:18:18 GMT
Janssen vs Keefe fight.
|
|
Ghost
Matt Myers
Posts: 1,698
|
Post by Ghost on Nov 7, 2015 22:18:59 GMT
Most seem to say the Ling knee incident was bad so expecting a large ban. Didn't see it myself so can't comment. Darnell had an absolute mare tonight, some dodgy calls both ways. The Murphy high stick on Myers in particular was an appalling no call.
In sport it's always said that its a good sign when you win despite not playing well - add that to the character we have showed in the last two home games coming from behind and I think we can take a lot of positives alongside 4 massive points.
|
|
|
Post by cjmatt42 on Nov 7, 2015 22:20:08 GMT
Great result, under the circumstances. The Ling incident looked like plenty we've seen already this year, not the best clash but at the same time nothing in it, Lloyd missed no shifts. I don't think he iced on any other power play as he doesn't have any talent and as soon as panthers were even strength he was back on the ice. Can see DOPS calling it as a minimum of 2 games with us playing Steelers next Sunday.
As a question how many men need to be on the ice to get a too many men call? I reckon Giants had 9 when the puck hit their player with two minutes to go! I've never played the game so don't know the rules inside out but is that not just a counting tasks? Can players going off the ice be classed so off ice even if the puck is interfered with by one of their players?
|
|
|
Post by jdizpt8 on Nov 7, 2015 22:34:01 GMT
Tanaka got no ban for his knee on Shultz and it wasn't even reviewed, Ling will no doubt get a ban. Sounded like we ground out the result tonight which is good to see, nice that we can play physical, grind out games and generate offensive play at the flick of a switch! Hope we bring in cover for Shultz
|
|
Yotes
Forum Admin
Posts: 16,625
|
Post by Yotes on Nov 7, 2015 22:39:47 GMT
Well he's definitely banned for 1, just whether DOPS add any more. Will wait for the video. Thought our reaction was quite telling, and it's not exactly out of character for him.
Good result, bit like last week I'm not 100% sure how we took the points though. Wiikman v Murphy is a huge advantage for us, he's often worth a couple (Lacho and Betteridge tonight), I dunno why they persist with it personally. But that's their problem.
|
|
|
Post by thebestpanthers on Nov 7, 2015 22:40:47 GMT
Tanaka got no ban for his knee on Shultz and it wasn't even reviewed, Ling will no doubt get a ban. Sounded like we ground out the result tonight which is good to see, nice that we can play physical, grind out games and generate offensive play at the flick of a switch! Hope we bring in cover for Shultz Yes - but Tanaka was not due to play against steelers for the next couple of games - as we play them next week-end expect at least a two game ban - could have been worse it could have been Janssen who is far more use to the team than Ling - wonder how Pering would have coped with tonights game?
|
|
Dan
Forum Admin
Boss
Posts: 5,891
|
Post by Dan on Nov 7, 2015 22:49:24 GMT
Sounds like a reckless act by Ling. Stupid by our most experienced player.
|
|
|
Post by marshalfish on Nov 7, 2015 23:04:18 GMT
Well he's definitely banned for 1, just whether DOPS add any more. Will wait for the video. Thought our reaction was quite telling, and it's not exactly out of character for him. Good result, bit like last week I'm not 100% sure how we took the points though. Wiikman v Murphy is a huge advantage for us, he's often worth a couple (Lacho and Betteridge tonight), I dunno why they persist with it personally. But that's their problem. So, an honest question here. We are by our own admission, running an import down, not counting the injuries. Ling will get at least a game, or more with the Steeler effect, so have we got to play one short of the number of imports that we have already, or one shy of the permitted total, (is it 13?), which we are already really. what I mean by that is that as we have signed 12 of 13, if they say we have one on a ban, then that will leave 12, which we are using now. Sorry if the numbers are wrong.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2015 23:07:23 GMT
You didn't ask a question....
|
|
iginla
Chick Zamick
Posts: 13,484
|
Post by iginla on Nov 7, 2015 23:07:58 GMT
Great character win that.
Kolnik is class,Lacho much improved,Ling ban coming,crowd excellent tonight,Darnell **** off back to Denmark sharpish you useless clown.
Panthers....just get two imports signed and soon.
|
|
Yotes
Forum Admin
Posts: 16,625
|
Post by Yotes on Nov 7, 2015 23:09:29 GMT
Well he's definitely banned for 1, just whether DOPS add any more. Will wait for the video. Thought our reaction was quite telling, and it's not exactly out of character for him. Good result, bit like last week I'm not 100% sure how we took the points though. Wiikman v Murphy is a huge advantage for us, he's often worth a couple (Lacho and Betteridge tonight), I dunno why they persist with it personally. But that's their problem. So, an honest question here. We are by our own admission, running an import down, not counting the injuries. Ling will get at least a game, or more with the Steeler effect, so have we got to play one short of the number of imports that we have already, or one shy of the permitted total, (is it 13?), which we are already really. what I mean by that is that as we have signed 12 of 13, if they say we have one on a ban, then that will leave 12, which we are using now. Sorry if the numbers are wrong. 1 shy of the permitted total. So the only difference we should see is no Ling, we could even sign someone midweek I should think (haha).
|
|
|
Post by marshalfish on Nov 7, 2015 23:16:01 GMT
You didn't ask a question.... OK. We're one down in import numbers, Ling's ban makes it 2 down. Could we sign a Euro to get us back to one short for the duration? As I see it, a ban would mean we had to play an import short, so we could get someeone in to be one short. All tongue in cheek stirring by the way.
|
|
iginla
Chick Zamick
Posts: 13,484
|
Post by iginla on Nov 7, 2015 23:20:35 GMT
There will still be people who think it was a good idea to go with imports short or not bring replacements in.
It wasn't......as we will see soon enough,because we won't continue nicking these wins if we keep going with only ten or eleven imports on the ice each game.
|
|