iginla
Chick Zamick
Posts: 13,484
|
Post by iginla on Jan 26, 2016 20:12:07 GMT
I wouldn't hold your breath about Tanaka's ban being reduced,because Coventry play Steelers twice this coming weekend !
|
|
|
Post by GuinnessMan on Jan 28, 2016 22:21:54 GMT
TANAKA BAN REDUCED TO ONE GAME Following a review by an independent panel, the three-match ban from the Department of Player Safety on Coventry Blaze forward Cale Tanaka for High Sticking has been reduced to one game. Tanaka has already served his one match suspension, in last Friday’s game at Belfast Giants, so is free to play. www.eliteleague.co.uk/tanaka-ban-reduced-to-one-game/
|
|
|
Post by thebestpanthers on Jan 28, 2016 22:26:31 GMT
TANAKA BAN REDUCED TO ONE GAME Following a review by an independent panel, the three-match ban from the Department of Player Safety on Coventry Blaze forward Cale Tanaka for High Sticking has been reduced to one game. Tanaka has already served his one match suspension, in last Friday’s game at Belfast Giants, so is free to play. www.eliteleague.co.uk/tanaka-ban-reduced-to-one-game/Are Steelers losing their control of the league?? - problems with CC dates and now this - Tony will not be happy - needs to enforce the Chairman's authority
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2016 22:26:48 GMT
Consistency from DOPS appeal procedure.....
Another 'theory' blown out of the water.
|
|
Yotes
Forum Admin
Posts: 16,625
|
Post by Yotes on Jan 29, 2016 11:57:43 GMT
Correct decision on Tanaka, given precedents already set this season. It's something they need to sort out in the off season though, beginning to look pointless using DOPS unless the outcome is 1 or 2 games.
|
|
Yotes
Forum Admin
Posts: 16,625
|
Post by Yotes on Jan 29, 2016 13:50:21 GMT
|
|
|
Post by tootootrain on Jan 29, 2016 14:53:13 GMT
About time he got called on that. Let's see if they get called for Simms' recent brain fart too.
|
|
Yotes
Forum Admin
Posts: 16,625
|
Post by Yotes on Jan 29, 2016 15:23:04 GMT
If they start fining Dave for his twitterings we'll at least have the cash to install video review at all 10 rinks.
|
|
|
Post by panthersdave on Jan 29, 2016 15:24:20 GMT
What was said?
|
|
iginla
Chick Zamick
Posts: 13,484
|
Post by iginla on Jan 29, 2016 18:15:59 GMT
There is just no leeway when the bans are only small.
If I was Rutherford today,i would be pretty naffed off for doing not a lot,but getting the same one game ban as Tanaka for a stick to the face or Mosienko for spearing to the neck area. I'm no Giants fan,but if Rutherford got a one game ban,thenTanaka and Mosienko should have got three games each !
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2016 16:50:33 GMT
www.eliteleague.co.uk/dops-reviews-3/Am I mistaken or is Spearing not an automatic review penalty? I was certain it was when Mosienko speared our lad in Sheffield. Oh and can't stop giggling at the one Clan fan on the Clan forum calling Cam a terrible, dirty player while overlooking his man McIver getting booked for checking to the head in two consecutive games. Edit: or are three calls of checking to the head in two games the consequences of the 'open season' on head shots as a result of poor decisions made by DOPS and the infamous independent panel?
|
|
|
Post by Bagheera on Feb 9, 2016 17:06:30 GMT
Would have been an automatic review if it was a match penalty. I believe this was only a game penalty on the night. Would need a request from Panthers to review.
Funny how thr Clan themselves don't deam Cams hit to be review worthy. Maybe their fans will shut up now. Then again(although it was a clean hit anyway) Conflict of interest springs to mind.
|
|
|
Post by ted logan on Feb 9, 2016 17:23:39 GMT
Would have been an automatic review if it was a match penalty. I believe this was only a game penalty on the night. Would need a request from Panthers to review. Funny how thr Clan themselves don't deam Cams hit to be review worthy. Maybe their fans will shut up now. Then again(although it was a clean hit anyway) Conflict of interest springs to mind. I think Panthers deliberately included Cam's hit on the highlights. Just to prove that it was a clean hit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2016 18:58:57 GMT
So the perfectly clean hit by Cam didn't get a review request?!
Their forum will be in uproar.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2016 10:40:01 GMT
So the perfectly clean hit by Cam didn't get a review request?! Their forum will be in uproar. Got a feeling Finnerty will be saving the request money to appeal through the solid gold appeals process.
|
|
iginla
Chick Zamick
Posts: 13,484
|
Post by iginla on Feb 10, 2016 12:10:27 GMT
Looks like these days you can do pretty much what you like as a player and it's only a one match ban,because any more than one game and they know it will get appealed and be successful because of stupid earlier precedents set....joke Dops.
The Clan fans have gone very quiet too all of a sudden,now they've seen Mcivers hit !
|
|
|
Post by mattscold on Feb 10, 2016 12:23:21 GMT
Has 2-Point Tony heard about this? This is an outrage.
This shouldn't happen to the best coach to ever grace the game and is unacceptable from DOPs
|
|
Yotes
Forum Admin
Posts: 16,625
|
Post by Yotes on Feb 10, 2016 12:26:00 GMT
What do you think the fine is? Fiver?
|
|
BigLad
David Clarke
Threads: @AntMJ11
Posts: 3,593
|
Post by BigLad on Feb 10, 2016 12:37:32 GMT
What do you think the fine is? Fiver? What's the point? It's just 2PT paying himself anyway!
|
|
|
Post by GuinnessMan on Feb 10, 2016 12:55:56 GMT
Looks like these days you can do pretty much what you like as a player and it's only a one match ban,because any more than one game and they know it will get appealed and be successful because of stupid earlier precedents set....joke Dops. The Clan fans have gone very quiet too all of a sudden,now they've seen Mcivers hit ! I'm not a fan, personally, of the huge bans that were previously given out, but the hits to the head do have to be discouraged with penalties greater than a 1 match ban. For this year the precedents have been set, but i hope for next year Simon Kirkham will review this year as a whole and establish some better guidelines for the Department of Player Safety to work to.
|
|
|
Post by Flying Viking on Feb 10, 2016 13:18:22 GMT
Interesting that the DOPS video says there was no injury on the McIver hit, yet Dimmen left the game injured, and didn't play the following night. I suppose they have to be certain that the injury Dimmen sustained was directly a result of that hit, before they can take it into account. Did Dimmen play another shift after the hit? I seem to recall he was on the bench for a few more minutes before he went down the tunnel.
|
|
Ian
Matt Myers
Posts: 1,702
|
Post by Ian on Feb 10, 2016 13:22:40 GMT
Latest decisions are no surprise, but show up the inappropriateness of the DOPS name. Meant to be protecting PLAYER SAFETY but they are essentially saying they are happy for a guy who gets checking to the head penalties in two consecutive games to be playing again after just one game out. How exactly is that in the interests of player safety then? And what about censure for the coach of a team that has three checking to the head penalties in two consecutive nights?
Just shows that they have no interest in player safety at all, bigger bans for chucking water bottles and comments in interviews than dangerous play.
|
|
|
Post by panthers_nyr on Feb 10, 2016 13:27:37 GMT
Interesting that the DOPS video says there was no injury on the McIver hit, yet Dimmen left the game injured, and didn't play the following night. I suppose they have to be certain that the injury Dimmen sustained was directly a result of that hit, before they can take it into account. Did Dimmen play another shift after the hit? I seem to recall he was on the bench for a few more minutes before he went down the tunnel. He played another shift which was approximately 15 seconds long after sitting on the bench for a few minutes and after going end to end he looked dazed and rushed back to the bench and down the tunnel.
|
|
Yotes
Forum Admin
Posts: 16,625
|
Post by Yotes on Feb 10, 2016 13:29:12 GMT
I'd imagine DOPS aren't too happy with the way it's going, as has been said they hamstrung themselves with their earlier lenient ruling, and the "independent panel" has made sure everything follows suit.
In the summer the clubs really need to come up with some basic guideline tariffs for DOPS to enforce, publish them so we all know what's what, and then stick to them.
|
|
|
Post by dill1015 on Feb 10, 2016 14:57:15 GMT
I'd imagine DOPS aren't too happy with the way it's going, as has been said they hamstrung themselves with their earlier lenient ruling, and the "independent panel" has made sure everything follows suit. In the summer the clubs really need to come up with some basic guideline tariffs for DOPS to enforce, publish them so we all know what's what, and then stick to them. The problem with tariffs is that the same penalty may be called on two different plays, but the severity can be wildly different. But i do agree that they gave themselves a problem by being too light on a few incidents earlier in the season.
|
|