Yotes
Forum Admin 
Posts: 16,412
|
Post by Yotes on Oct 21, 2018 15:51:01 GMT
No thanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Flying Shirt on Oct 21, 2018 15:53:06 GMT
Money straight to the islands in the sun |
|
|
|
Post by spik on Oct 21, 2018 15:53:17 GMT
Not for me to pay but without endorsing the actions the Elite need to step up as regards 'same' refs throughout a weekend.
|
|
iginla
Chick Zamick
Posts: 13,424
|
Post by iginla on Oct 21, 2018 15:59:55 GMT
Nope.
Gary can raid the sock drawer,there’s plenty of cash sloshing around in his office desk. 😉
|
|
BigLad
David Clarke
TWITTER: @AntMJ11
Posts: 3,585
|
Post by BigLad on Oct 21, 2018 20:46:54 GMT
Ban and fine was deserved. You can't be throwing poo poo on the ice regardless of how bad the officiating was.
|
|
|
|
Post by ted logan on Oct 21, 2018 21:43:43 GMT
Nope. Gary can raid the sock drawer,there’s plenty of cash sloshing around in his office desk. 😉 Yep. Let that grey haired old throbber pay it. Then retire |
|
nottinghamsenator
Robert Lachowicz
How much wood could a Tkachuk chuck if a Tkachuk could chuck wood?
Posts: 424
|
Post by nottinghamsenator on Oct 21, 2018 22:59:05 GMT
What?! Irrespective of all that could have been done to avoid this on Fife’s/EIHL’s end, ultimately he was wrong to lose his temper and IMO a fine alone would have been adequate punishement. He’s paid to do a job and to be a representative of the club, it’s not like they slapped him with this after a rational discussion with the referees.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2018 4:38:46 GMT
You've clearly never seen this been done before ... It's called PASSION .. if welcome him to do it more often of he's incensed by bad calls..
I'd rather see this than a coach with his arms folded looking gormless!
|
|
Yotes
Forum Admin
Posts: 16,412
|
Post by Yotes on Oct 22, 2018 7:16:45 GMT
Would be the quickest way for him to get sacked. Doubt Neil will be too impressed with that bill.
Where's the OP gone?
|
|
iginla
Chick Zamick
Posts: 13,424
|
Post by iginla on Oct 22, 2018 7:47:14 GMT
You've clearly never seen this been done before ... It's called PASSION .. i’d welcome him to do it more often if he's incensed by bad calls.. I'd rather see this than a coach with his arms folded looking gormless! Pidge now look,Corey’s gone now so please stop referring back to him on every thread. 😉 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2018 8:23:33 GMT
You've clearly never seen this been done before ... It's called PASSION .. i’d welcome him to do it more often if he's incensed by bad calls.. I'd rather see this than a coach with his arms folded looking gormless! Pidge now look,Corey’s gone now so please stop referring back to him on every thread. 😉 I never mentioned names Iggy 😉😂 |
|
BigLad
David Clarke
TWITTER: @AntMJ11
Posts: 3,585
|
Post by BigLad on Oct 22, 2018 11:30:40 GMT
You've clearly never seen this been done before ... It's called PASSION .. if welcome him to do it more often of he's incensed by bad calls.. I'd rather see this than a coach with his arms folded looking gormless! Passion is fine. Throwing poo poo will get you a ban. Simple. If you want our coach suspended for multiple games you're a loon. |
|
|
|
Post by Carnell on Oct 22, 2018 13:33:31 GMT
You've clearly never seen this been done before ... It's called PASSION .. if welcome him to do it more often of he's incensed by bad calls.. I'd rather see this than a coach with his arms folded looking gormless! I have no issue with coach/players being passionate, but when he's been moaning about players taking dumb penalties and leaving us killing penalties constantly, you don't expect a coach to be doing the same, you need a coach to lead by example. We had a 2min call which meant we was going onto the PK, with him doing that, it lead to another penalty, which meant a 5v3 for a full 2mins, which they scored on IIRC. I dont think we will see a similar outburst again, verbal maybe, but smashing stuff and throwing items onto the ice doesn't look good for the club, never mind the person responsible, funny as it may look, its doesn't set the right example to the rest of the players on the bench. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2018 14:07:15 GMT
We've seen plenty of verbals from Rich already and it isn't Christmas yet lol. I think frustration at the standard of officiating may have led to this as well. We all lose our cool from time to time lol
|
|
|
|
Post by kezypanther on Oct 22, 2018 17:23:46 GMT
Hopefully the fine pays for the goad awful refs training for a week.
|
|
|
|
Post by pantherdman on Oct 22, 2018 19:13:59 GMT
Hopefully he fines the players for 2 garbage performances, that will cover the grand.
Hope the fine goes towards the refs training. It won’t, it will go straight out the game.
Think rich was trying to get the players fired up. Good to see he cares. Hope he smashed a few tea cups in the dressing room too.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobness on Oct 23, 2018 14:02:34 GMT
We had a 2min call which meant we was going onto the PK, with him doing that, it lead to another penalty, which meant a 5v3 for a full 2mins, which they scored on IIRC. Point of order. Panthers were 68 seconds into a PP when the Hurtubise and Chernomaz penalties were taken (which possibly even makes it worse...) meaning they went from being on the PP to killing a 4 on 3, then at 32.33, it became a 5 on 3, for the 32 seconds it took Fife to score, then there was a further 36 second 5 on 4. (At least, that's what it looks like to me, looking at the game sheet) The initial 2 minute call on Hurtubise wouldn't have resulted in an immediate PK situation, and there was no 2 minute 5 on 3, nor would there ever have been. By my reckoning, that's the 8th time this year that Panthers have been on a PP, only to take a penalty themselves and thus nullify it. More than 10% of Panthers' powerplays so far have been shortened because they themselves take a penalty. I've nothing to compare it with, but that seems a lot to me? |
|
|
|
Post by wgray on Oct 23, 2018 16:00:37 GMT
We had a 2min call which meant we was going onto the PK, with him doing that, it lead to another penalty, which meant a 5v3 for a full 2mins, which they scored on IIRC. Point of order. Panthers were 68 seconds into a PP when the Hurtubise and Chernomaz penalties were taken (which possibly even makes it worse...) meaning they went from being on the PP to killing a 4 on 3, then at 32.33, it became a 5 on 3, for the 32 seconds it took Fife to score, then there was a further 36 second 5 on 4. (At least, that's what it looks like to me, looking at the game sheet) The initial 2 minute call on Hurtubise wouldn't have resulted in an immediate PK situation, and there was no 2 minute 5 on 3, nor would there ever have been. By my reckoning, that's the 8th time this year that Panthers have been on a PP, only to take a penalty themselves and thus nullify it. More than 10% of Panthers' powerplays so far have been shortened because they themselves take a penalty. I've nothing to compare it with, but that seems a lot to me? They must have got the game sheet wrong, on the night, Hurtubise was called for goalie interference when we scored and it was at that point Rich lost it, so both penalties were definitely called at the same time. |
|
Yotes
Forum Admin
Posts: 16,412
|
Post by Yotes on Oct 23, 2018 18:01:29 GMT
Bob's saying we were on the powerplay when the double penalty happened. So we put ourselves on the PK. He's right too, Cazzola was sitting (30.33), although they had scored short-handed already (31.03), then the pens (31.41). Hell of a minute  |
|
EMB
Randall Weber
Posts: 4,045
|
Post by EMB on Oct 23, 2018 18:07:06 GMT
Your right we scored I believe but it was washed out for goalie interference I think what did Rich was the fact they couldn’t review it as there was apparently no tv or replay equipment so the goal couldn’t be proved. He went absolutely mental. 2nd night in a row a disallowed goal and no replay available.
|
|
Yotes
Forum Admin
Posts: 16,412
|
Post by Yotes on Oct 23, 2018 18:13:41 GMT
Would you be able to review a minor penalty like that?
|
|
|
|
Post by bobness on Oct 23, 2018 18:52:10 GMT
Would you be able to review a minor penalty like that? Refs can review potential goals, for men in crease, high sticks etc, and there’s this coach’s challenge thing that no-one seems to know about. |
|
rjc
Jade Galbraith
Posts: 30 
|
Post by rjc on Oct 23, 2018 20:41:45 GMT
I thought it was in Glasgow where they couldn’t review the goal due to “technical” issues. In Fife the official ruled it out and then refused Chernomaz the review. So he went ape. Could well have got it wrong it was a long weekend up there..
|
|
Yotes
Forum Admin
Posts: 16,412
|
Post by Yotes on Oct 23, 2018 21:48:56 GMT
Would you be able to review a minor penalty like that? Refs can review potential goals, for men in crease, high sticks etc, and there’s this coach’s challenge thing that no-one seems to know about. But they wiped out the goal because he thought it was a pen, so surely he'd be reviewing his call of a minor penalty rather than the goal itself? Would just seem an odd one, basically goal or you're off to the bin. |
|
|
|
Post by wgray on Oct 23, 2018 22:50:18 GMT
I think the Fife highlights have supported Rich’s frustrations, how is anybody interfering with Owen and preventing him from trying to save the puck?
It was Bolduc who took the puck the net, Owen comes out to challenge him and poke the puck away at the edge of the crease, as he does Bolduc slots it past him, they then collide. The really brilliant part of all this is that the refs then decide to call Hurtubise for goalie interference when he wasn’t even involved in the play. Brilliant stuff.
|
|
