Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2011 10:05:20 GMT
Had a quick look on NHL section and cannot see any mention of this. Interesting decision in NHL over the weekend, however, it has been pretty well explained why the action has been taken to Brad Boyes. I know we do not have a rule book per se, but sure as hell, it will be used if the situation arises here in UK. Wonder if Gui has been tipped off..... What do you all think? video.nhl.com/videocenter/console?catid=35&id=124715 |
|
|
|
Post by asbo26 on Sept 27, 2011 17:56:44 GMT
Matt Stephenson only got 2+10 against the Blaze for a check to the head.
|
|
|
|
Post by marksteeler on Sept 27, 2011 19:01:49 GMT
Matt Stephenson only got 2+10 against the Blaze for a check to the head. It wasnt a check to the head. Should have been called boarding or checking from behind but it wasnt to the head. |
|
|
|
Post by thfnick on Sept 28, 2011 6:53:08 GMT
Matt Stephenson only got 2+10 against the Blaze for a check to the head. It wasnt a check to the head. Should have been called boarding or checking from behind but it wasnt to the head. Indeed, the hit was no higher than the middle of the back. |
|
5+game
Terry Kurtenbach
Posts: 2,974
|
Post by 5+game on Sept 28, 2011 10:19:51 GMT
I realy dont understand why a check to the head is only a 2+10, i thnk if you commit a check to the head it should be an automatic game misconduct.
Checking to the head is an easy way to end a career.
however with our refs half of them dont know the difference between a check to the head and a tripping call half the time.
|
|
panthermick
Ross Lambert
visit Hockey Net UK for all the latest hockey news results fixtures stats photo's & much more
Posts: 1,345
|
Post by panthermick on Sept 28, 2011 14:52:20 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by asbo26 on Sept 28, 2011 18:07:37 GMT
I wasn't at the game so i can't comment weather it was a check to the head or not.
However, that is what the ref called so the penalty received by the player should reflect that.
|
|
