|
|
Post by charlish2099 on Oct 31, 2006 15:05:38 GMT
Hopefully this will cut the penaltys down a tiny bit www.panthers.co.ukis it just me or was this how it was anyway? |
|
|
|
Post by ted on Oct 31, 2006 15:09:41 GMT
Thats how it was MEANT to be but wasnt being called like that....
I assumed it was only out of the defensive zone at the moment. BUT According to that up till now it was anywhere on the ice... which definately wasnt being called.
|
|
Rich
Paul Adey
Go hard or go home
Posts: 6,691
|
Post by Rich on Oct 31, 2006 15:12:22 GMT
Can anyone confirm one thing, only people on the ice at the time can take a penalty shot?
|
|
MP
Paul Adey
Hail hurts and rain is cold. Summer in the mountains
Posts: 6,811
|
Post by MP on Oct 31, 2006 17:44:13 GMT
Hallelujah! ;D
Better late than never I guess but common sense now prevails (more or less).
|
|
|
|
Post by Alf Garnett on Oct 31, 2006 17:48:57 GMT
Can anyone confirm one thing, only people on the ice at the time can take a penalty shot? That's the way I understant it Rich. I thought that if (player x) was hauled down right in on goal that (players x) was awarded the shot himself? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2006 19:42:24 GMT
I gather there is a new rule book this season and I only have a copy of the 2002-2006 version at the moment. However, it says in there, "The Captain of the non-offending team selects and reports to the Referee the number of any non-penalized player who shall take the shot." (rule 509 - penalty shot procedure).
I've got another one for you all, courtesy of a colleague at work who obviously thinks more deeply about the game because it never occurred to me (congratulations Rosemary).
Team B is 2-1 down in the last minute. They pull their goalie, but then ice the puck. Given the new rule about no line changes following an icing, are they allowed to return their goalie to the ice for the resultant face-off, which will of course be in their defensive zone?
|
|
