Yotes
Forum Admin 
Posts: 16,625
|
Post by Yotes on Dec 9, 2016 12:20:50 GMT
GMs already started the inquiry into how this has been leaked to the plebs.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kovalchuk17 on Dec 9, 2016 12:30:32 GMT
I found it on the floor of Saltbox
|
|
|
|
Post by spik on Dec 9, 2016 13:20:47 GMT
I've been lucky enough to get my hands on the Panthers post game press release template: "Begin by disabling spell check. Do not refer to player name pages to check correct spelling. You have 5 minutes, good luck... Opening paragraph: Start with at least two excuses. Make strong point of any notable injuries or illnesses and where it left us short (even if it's not actually left us short). Second paragraph: Start with a comment about why a previous fixture was lost and what could have been different now (e.g. A player returning or even just closer to returning). Maybe quickly mention a key moment in the game but don't dwell as an excuse must always come first. Third and fourth, maybe a fifth, paragraphs: Get through the key points of the game in short succinct sentences. Keep details minimal unless we were screwed over or someone on the other team performed better than any of us (especially a GK pulling out world class saves with his chestpads). Final paragraphs: End with blind optimism. Whether win, loss or draw, the next game will always be more exciting. Promote the GMs wireless radio interview. Briefly mention any away fixtures but we don't get money from them so keep it under 10 words. Copy & paste key messages to keep fans rolling in: 'Good seats still available.' 'The louder the roar, the bigger the score.' 'SEE YOU THERE!' 'TICKETS MAKE GREAT PRESENTS!' Finish with an image of Dan Green's game stats. We could add more but our fans won't understand past the shots on goal count." Just about spot on 'just about'...?  Sorry. I'm rubbing salt into the wounds but it's this or cry these days. I must be more positive, I know. 'Light, window - light, window'. That's better. |
|
|
|
Post by fishman on Dec 9, 2016 17:49:59 GMT
The 3rd clan goal, doesn't look in to me
|
|
|
|
Post by wgray on Dec 9, 2016 18:27:31 GMT
Two good goals from Carter looking at the highlights, hopefully he can keep it going
|
|
|
|
Post by fishman on Dec 9, 2016 18:39:44 GMT
Two good goals from Carter looking at the highlights, hopefully he can keep it going What did you think about Clan's 3rd?  ? |
|
iginla
Chick Zamick
Posts: 13,484
|
Post by iginla on Dec 9, 2016 19:52:24 GMT
Two good goals from Carter looking at the highlights, hopefully he can keep it going What did you think about Clan's 3rd? ? From the quick look you got,I didn't think it went in either. Shooting from that distance/trajectory I don't really see how it could hit the netting under the bar and come out again. That usually only happens with a shot from close in where the puck is going up at a steepish angle.....like that Galbraith pen shot did a few years ago. |
|
|
|
Post by wgray on Dec 9, 2016 21:21:45 GMT
Two good goals from Carter looking at the highlights, hopefully he can keep it going What did you think about Clan's 3rd? ? really difficult to tell from the viewing angle we got, but I can't understand how it would have bounced out that way if it hit the back bar. On the highlights as well it's funny that the goal line judge puts the light on after the players and fans have jumped up in celebration! If only officials had goal line technology in place to help them or even just video replays, nothing is ever simple though |
|
|
|
Post by pantherlee on Dec 9, 2016 22:00:52 GMT
From what I can tell I think hits the post, goes in and hits strap of leather/material connecting the cross bar and back bar. That's the only thing I can see that would make the puck deflect down and out
|
|
|
|
Post by spik on Dec 9, 2016 22:03:26 GMT
What did you think about Clan's 3rd? ? really difficult to tell from the viewing angle we got, but I can't understand how it would have bounced out that way if it hit the back bar. On the highlights as well it's funny that the goal line judge puts the light on after the players and fans have jumped up in celebration! If only officials had goal line technology in place to help them or even just video replays, nothing is ever simple though Not the back bar...IF anything only the white padding in the middle, just under the bar. Can only be the answer. So bad that we had ours washed out too. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2016 0:05:50 GMT
Clan's 3rd goal is clearly a good goal. No debate imo.
|
|
tim27
Jade Galbraith
Posts: 80
|
Post by tim27 on Dec 10, 2016 9:26:26 GMT
yeah clearly a good goal
|
|
|
|
Post by kievthegreat on Dec 10, 2016 9:29:18 GMT
Yeah. Hits the post and then the white bar inside the goal.
|
|
|
|
Post by ted logan on Dec 10, 2016 10:57:30 GMT
Has there been an explanation as to why the Macmillan 'goal' was not given?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2016 11:10:55 GMT
Has there been an explanation as to why the Macmillan 'goal' was not given? Well it didn't go in the net.... So that's good enough for starters. Very clear deflection in to the side of the net off Keith's leg. The red light being lit confused the matter a tad but clear no goal. |
|
|
|
Post by ted logan on Dec 10, 2016 11:21:31 GMT
Has there been an explanation as to why the Macmillan 'goal' was not given? Well it didn't go in the net.... So that's good enough for starters. Very clear deflection in to the side of the net off Keith's leg. The red light being lit confused the matter a tad but clear no goal. Just watched it properly (as opposed to my initial 'viewing' through my cracked phone screen). Definitely not in. Goal judge gave it though, ref initially gave it, commentator thought it was a goal. So maybe not as clear therefore as your sarcastic reply implies. Correct decision reached in the end though. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2016 11:38:35 GMT
Well it didn't go in the net.... So that's good enough for starters. Very clear deflection in to the side of the net off Keith's leg. The red light being lit confused the matter a tad but clear no goal. Just watched it properly (as opposed to my initial 'viewing' through my cracked phone screen). Definitely not in. Goal judge gave it though, ref initially gave it, commentator thought it was a goal. So maybe not as clear therefore as your sarcastic reply implies. Correct decision reached in the end though. I wasn't intending to be sarcastic. Apologies. |
|
Shorty
Paul Adey
Still here for Private Messages
Posts: 6,636
|
Post by Shorty on Dec 10, 2016 11:51:08 GMT
Has there been an explanation as to why the Macmillan 'goal' was not given? They must have assumed that on the law of probability he wouldn't have scored. |
|
|
|
Post by ted logan on Dec 10, 2016 11:53:54 GMT
Just watched it properly (as opposed to my initial 'viewing' through my cracked phone screen). Definitely not in. Goal judge gave it though, ref initially gave it, commentator thought it was a goal. So maybe not as clear therefore as your sarcastic reply implies. Correct decision reached in the end though. I wasn't intending to be sarcastic. Apologies.  |
|
|
|
Post by harlan on Dec 10, 2016 12:58:25 GMT
Overall that was a poor game played by two teams with very little confidence in a library atmosphere and with the appearance of a recce or training game.
Panthers only had 14 outskaters and played Macmillan on D.
First period was the Panthers and although Carters finish for the first goal was fortunate his stick work leading up to it was very nice. Spang hit the post and ref Craig did signal goal for the Macmillan shot although it did clearly hit the outside of the net.
Clan came more into the game as it went on and from the far end of the rink their third goal looked like it hit the bar to me and Craig never signalled goal and although the light initially went on it quickly went off again and Craig only awarded goal after discussions with goal judge and linesmen.
The longer the game went on their looked to be only one winner in Clan as Panthers looked like they were running out of steam due to the lack of bodies and Panthers looked like they were going to be happy going home only a goal down so the Carter back hand to tie the game was a bonus and on balance probably right.
That is the poorest Clan team I have ever seen. They sat 4 across the blue line all night and a team with speed will easily break that down but Panthers weren't that team on Thurs and both teams D looked very fragile and unsure of themselves.
Last 90 seconds or so showed the ignorance of the sparse Clan fans as the home team allowed Panthers to have the puck in their own zone and were so passive on the forecheck, well actually it was a non-existent forecheck as they sat in the neutral zone and the Clan fans were booing the Panthers for not taking the game to the Clan
|
|
|
|
Post by Kovalchuk17 on Dec 10, 2016 14:08:00 GMT
Spang hit the post and ref Craig did signal goal for the Macmillan shot although it did clearly hit the outside of the net. MacMillan actually getting a shot in demands it's own ref signal. |
|
|
|
Post by pantherlee on Dec 10, 2016 15:43:49 GMT
Spang hit the post and ref Craig did signal goal for the Macmillan shot although it did clearly hit the outside of the net. MacMillan actually getting a shot in demands it's own ref signal. Does it involve the ref fainting mid ice from sheer disbelief |
|
|
|
Post by Kovalchuk17 on Dec 10, 2016 16:17:34 GMT
MacMillan actually getting a shot in demands it's own ref signal. Does it involve the ref fainting mid ice from sheer disbelief Yeah, signalling for help. A good Neilson tactic to try and exploit the similarities of a goal signal. Well played Corey. |
|
iginla
Chick Zamick
Posts: 13,484
|
Post by iginla on Dec 10, 2016 16:58:11 GMT
Does it involve the ref fainting mid ice from sheer disbelief Yeah, signalling for help. A good Neilson tactic to try and exploit the similarities of a goal signal. Well played Corey. Corey signalling for help.....Nah,that would involve him actually taking his hands out of his pockets ! |
|
?
