|
|
Post by sanjosefan on Oct 18, 2011 15:01:13 GMT
Just been confirmed, one of England's finest ever bands the Stone Roses have reformed!!
|
|
seedy
Pat Casey
Posts: 330
|
Post by seedy on Oct 20, 2011 9:43:55 GMT
why are people more interested in bands reforming than actually listening to and getting behind new music?
No wonder everything is so stagnant
|
|
|
|
Post by sanjosefan on Oct 20, 2011 11:23:17 GMT
The Stone Roses have spent the past few months writing tunes, why is everything stale we live in troubled times where risks aren't being made. Also this is the problem with Glee, X factor not alot of people go out and watch bands they'd rather watch a shower of the proverbial on the telly with a horrific mirowavable dinner.
Edited for language
|
|
lee
David Clarke
Posts: 3,712
|
Post by lee on Oct 20, 2011 11:34:54 GMT
My preference would be for them to crawl back under the rock they have been in for the last however many years, awful awful band...
Just my opinion of course, i never bought into the manchester brit poop rubbish.
|
|
|
|
Post by optimus on Oct 20, 2011 18:49:10 GMT
Quite liked them as a student 10 years ago but I prefer something heavier now. Can't say I'm jumping for joy at their return either.
|
|
|
|
Post by wheelsandsnipe on Oct 26, 2011 11:20:25 GMT
Brit poop? The Stone Roses were around long before that term was coined. Well Brit Pop anyway!
Absolutely cracking band in my opinion. First album was phenominal, second was still good despite the expectations of many.
|
|
Mark
Randall Weber
Experience has taught me that when it really matters the only person you can rely on is yourself.
Posts: 4,615
|
Post by Mark on Nov 20, 2011 14:10:09 GMT
Dreary and massively overrated in my opinion.
|
|
